Los Angeles Bus Accident Claims: 90-Day Rule in 2026

Working through the aftermath of a mass transit accident in Los Angeles presents unique legal challenges, particularly with recent updates to liability frameworks that directly impact victim compensation. These changes, effective January 1, 2026, significantly alter how claims against public entities are processed and adjudicated, demanding a proactive and informed approach from anyone seeking Los Angeles personal injury representation after a mass transit incident. What do these revisions mean for your ability to recover damages if you’re involved in a bus accident?

California Assembly Bill 2345: The New 90-Day Claim Window

The most impactful change for individuals pursuing a Los Angeles personal injury claim against a public entity stems from California Assembly Bill 2345, signed into law and effective January 1, 2026. This legislation amends Government Code Section 911.2, drastically shortening the period for presenting a written claim for personal injury, property damage, or death against a public entity from six months to 90 days. This is not a minor adjustment. It’s a fundamental shift in the procedural timeline that can make or break a case.

Before this amendment, victims had a relatively more generous six-month window to gather information, assess their injuries, and formally notify the responsible public agency of their intent to file a claim. Now, that period has been cut in half. This accelerated timeline means that if you are injured in a mass transit incident, such as a bus accident involving a Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) bus or a Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) Dash bus, you have a significantly reduced period to initiate formal legal action. Missing this 90-day deadline, without very specific and compelling reasons, will likely result in your claim being barred entirely. This change applies to all public entities in California, from state agencies down to local municipalities and transit authorities.

Injured in an accident?

Know what your case is worth with AI Injury Payout Calculator for FREE!

Start my free evaluation

Who Is Affected by These Changes?

These new regulations primarily affect anyone injured by a public entity or its employees. In the context of Los Angeles personal injury, this almost universally includes incidents involving mass transit. Agencies such as Los Angeles Metro (LA Metro), which operates a vast network of buses and trains across Los Angeles County, and the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), responsible for the city’s Dash bus service, are prime examples of public entities whose operations fall under these new rules. Commuter rail services like Metrolink, also a public entity, are similarly impacted.

If you were a passenger on a public bus or train, a pedestrian struck by one, or a driver involved in a collision with a public transit vehicle, these changes directly apply to your potential claim. The critical distinction lies in whether the transit operator is a public or private entity. While many taxi and rideshare services operate as private companies, the vast majority of Los Angeles’s mass transit infrastructure is publicly owned and operated. Identifying the exact entity responsible for the transit vehicle involved in your accident is the first, and often most challenging, step in adhering to this new 90-day deadline.

Steps to Take After a Mass Transit Accident

Given the compressed timeline, immediate action is paramount following a mass transit accident. Here are concrete steps to take:

1. Prioritize Medical Attention and Document Injuries

Your health is the absolute priority. Seek immediate medical attention, even if your injuries seem minor. Some injuries, particularly those affecting the spine or brain, may not manifest fully for days or weeks. A prompt medical evaluation creates an official record of your injuries, which is indispensable for any subsequent legal claim. Ensure all medical visits, diagnoses, and treatments are carefully documented.

2. Gather On-Scene Evidence

If physically able, collect as much evidence at the scene as possible. This includes taking photographs and videos of the accident scene, the transit vehicle, any involved vehicles, visible injuries, and environmental factors like road conditions or traffic signals. Obtain contact information from witnesses, including their names, phone numbers, and email addresses. If law enforcement responds, get the incident report number.

3. Identify the Responsible Public Entity

This step is important for compliance with Government Code Section 911.2. For a bus accident, note the bus number, route, and operating agency (e.g., “LA Metro” or “LADOT Dash”). This information is usually displayed prominently on the vehicle. For train incidents, note the line and operator. This precise identification allows your legal counsel to direct the claim to the correct governmental agency.

4. Consult with a Personal Injury Attorney Immediately

With the 90-day deadline looming, consulting an attorney specializing in Los Angeles personal injury cases, particularly those involving public entities, is no longer a recommendation but a necessity. An experienced attorney understands the intricacies of government claims, including the specific forms, submission procedures, and the strict adherence required. They can immediately begin investigating, gathering evidence, and preparing the formal claim, ensuring it is filed correctly and on time. Delaying this consultation can be fatal to your claim.

I cannot stress enough how critical this immediate consultation is. The window for filing is incredibly tight, and the process for claims against public entities is unforgiving. Many people mistakenly believe they have ample time, only to discover too late that their opportunity has passed. The complexity of these claims, coupled with the new deadline, means that waiting even a few weeks can put your case in jeopardy.

The Implications of “Excusable Neglect” Under the New Law

While Government Code Section 911.2 does allow for the possibility of filing a late claim under specific circumstances, the new AB 2345 also tightens the criteria for what constitutes “excusable neglect.” Previously, courts might have been more lenient in allowing late claims if a claimant could demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay. Now, the bar is significantly higher.

A late claim application must be filed within a “reasonable time not to exceed one year” after the accrual of the cause of action, and it must be accompanied by an affidavit stating the reason for the delay. The public entity then has 45 days to grant or deny the application. If denied, the claimant has six months to petition the court for relief. However, demonstrating “excusable neglect” requires showing that the failure to file on time was due to circumstances beyond the claimant’s control, such as severe incapacitation or a legitimate misunderstanding of the law, and that a reasonable person in similar circumstances would have also failed to file. The changes introduced by AB 2345 make it even more challenging to argue excusable neglect successfully. This means relying on the late claim provision is a risky strategy and should be avoided at all costs by filing within the initial 90-day window.

Working through the Specifics: LA Metro and LADOT Claims

Each public transit agency has its own specific claims process, though all must adhere to the overarching framework of the California Government Tort Claims Act. For instance, LA Metro (officially the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority) requires claims to be submitted to their Claims Department. Their website provides detailed instructions and forms, but working through these without legal expertise can be daunting. Similarly, LADOT has its own procedures for incidents involving their Dash buses or other city-operated vehicles. Understanding which specific form to use, where to send it, and what information to include is essential for ensuring your claim is properly presented. Errors in this initial stage can lead to outright rejection, even if the claim is filed within the 90-day window. According to the California Judicial Branch, proper claim presentation is a prerequisite to filing a lawsuit against a public entity. California Courts emphasize strict compliance with these claim presentation requirements.

The type of mass transit vehicle involved also influences the claims process. A bus accident might involve different investigative protocols than a train derailment. The nature of the incident, whether it’s a collision, a slip and fall on transit property, or an injury due to sudden braking, can impact the evidence collection and legal strategy. A seasoned attorney will know how to tailor the claim presentation to the specific facts of your case and the particular agency involved.

The Role of Evidence in a Mass Transit Accident Claim

Compelling evidence is the backbone of any successful personal injury claim. For mass transit accidents, this often includes:

• Accident Reports: Official reports from law enforcement (e.g., LAPD, CHP) or the transit agency itself.
• Witness Statements: Accounts from individuals who observed the accident.
• Surveillance Footage: Many public transit vehicles and stations are equipped with cameras. Requesting this footage promptly is important, as it may be overwritten.
• Medical Records: Detailed documentation of all injuries, treatments, and prognosis.
• Expert Testimony: In complex cases, accident reconstructionists, medical experts, or vocational rehabilitation specialists may be needed to establish liability or damages.
• Transit Agency Maintenance Records: To determine if mechanical failure or improper maintenance contributed to the accident.

Gathering this evidence within the 90-day window is a significant undertaking, underscoring the need for immediate legal assistance. Public entities, by their nature, are often well-resourced and will defend against claims vigorously. Presenting a carefully documented and legally sound claim from the outset positions you for the strongest possible outcome.

Understanding Damages in Mass Transit Accident Cases

If your claim is successful, you may be entitled to various types of damages. These typically include:

• Medical Expenses: Past and future costs related to your injuries, including hospital stays, doctor visits, physical therapy, medication, and assistive devices.
• Lost Wages: Income lost due to time off work, as well as future earning capacity if your injuries prevent you from returning to your previous employment.
• Pain and Suffering: Compensation for physical pain, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life resulting from the accident.
• Property Damage: Costs associated with repairing or replacing damaged personal property.

Quantifying these damages accurately requires a complete understanding of your injuries’ long-term impact and the financial implications. An attorney can work with medical professionals and economic experts to ensure all potential damages are considered and properly valued. For example, a severe spinal injury from a bus accident near the 101 Freeway in Hollywood could lead to lifelong medical needs and significant loss of earning potential, requiring a thorough assessment beyond immediate medical bills.

The revised Government Code Section 911.2, enacted via AB 2345, is a stark reminder of the unique challenges inherent in pursuing a Los Angeles personal injury claim against a public entity. The new 90-day claim window is a critical deadline that demands immediate and decisive action from victims of mass transit accidents. Failing to comply can extinguish your right to seek compensation, regardless of the severity of your injuries.